🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains among the most deadly – and momentous – days during multiple decades of conflict in this area.

Throughout the area of the incident – the memories of Bloody Sunday are painted on the structures and etched in people's minds.

A public gathering was organized on a chilly yet clear period in the city.

The demonstration was a protest against the system of imprisonment without charges – imprisoning people without legal proceedings – which had been implemented after three years of unrest.

Soldiers from the specialized division fatally wounded 13 people in the district – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly Irish nationalist community.

One image became especially memorable.

Photographs showed a religious figure, Fr Edward Daly, waving a stained with blood fabric in his effort to shield a crowd moving a teenager, the injured teenager, who had been mortally injured.

Media personnel recorded considerable film on the day.

Documented accounts includes the priest telling a reporter that troops "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "completely sure" that there was no reason for the discharge of weapons.

The narrative of events was rejected by the first inquiry.

The first investigation found the soldiers had been attacked first.

Throughout the resolution efforts, Tony Blair's government established a fresh examination, following pressure by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

That year, the conclusion by the investigation said that overall, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that zero among the individuals had posed any threat.

The then government leader, the Prime Minister, expressed regret in the House of Commons – saying killings were "unjustified and unacceptable."

Law enforcement commenced investigate the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as the defendant, was prosecuted for homicide.

Accusations were made concerning the fatalities of the first individual, twenty-two, and in his mid-twenties another victim.

Soldier F was also accused of attempting to murder several people, other civilians, more people, another person, and an unnamed civilian.

There is a judicial decision protecting the soldier's privacy, which his attorneys have maintained is required because he is at danger.

He told the examination that he had solely shot at persons who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was rejected in the final report.

Material from the examination was unable to be used directly as proof in the court case.

In the dock, the defendant was shielded from sight with a protective barrier.

He addressed the court for the initial occasion in the hearing at a hearing in that month, to respond "not guilty" when the charges were presented.

Kin of those who were killed on that day travelled from the city to the judicial building each day of the case.

One relative, whose sibling was died, said they were aware that attending the proceedings would be difficult.

"I can see the events in my recollection," the relative said, as we examined the primary sites mentioned in the case – from the street, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the adjacent Glenfada Park, where the individual and another victim were died.

"It reminds me to where I was that day.

"I assisted with the victim and put him in the vehicle.

"I relived the entire event during the testimony.

"Despite having to go through the process – it's still valuable for me."